Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.
Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded
A Personal Note to John Atkinson of "Stereophile" magazine
211.181.44.100 |
||
Posted on May 18, 2004 at 10:25:24 | ||
I 'harbor' one old reservation (grudge?) regarding you BUT--that aside--there is no mistaking your seriousness and responsiveness to others' questions and going out of your way--beyond the call of duty?--to address each and every issue that gets brought up regarding you, personally, or the publication you represent. That is highly commendable. You've even stooped so low--almost lowering yourself in the process--as to answer the likes of two inmates (!) who hardly registered worth. What editor of *any* hobbyist/specialist magazine would have done that? I search in vain. Yours appreciatively, G. Lewis |
Thank you, posted on May 18, 2004 at 13:55:00 | |
Posts: 4045
Location: New York Joined: November 24, 2003 |
>there is no mistaking your seriousness and responsiveness to others' >questions and going out of your way--beyond the call of duty?--to >address each and every issue that gets brought up regarding you, >personally, or the publication you represent. That is highly >commendable. Thanks Mr. Lewis. I admit it is unusual, but it stems from my attitude to the role of a magazine, which is not to hand down received wisdom but to develop an ongoing dialog with its readers. You can read an essay I wrote on this subject at http://www.stereophile.com/asweseeit/371. And if anyone is going to be attending HE2004 in NY this weekend, I would be delighted to chat in person about any issues people might have with Stereophile, not only at the "Ask the Editors" session on Saturday afternoon, but also in the corridors of the Hilton. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
Re: Thank you / You're most welcome., posted on May 19, 2004 at 09:50:34 | |
n.t. |
Me too. The only real geezer I ever see is the one, posted on May 19, 2004 at 12:02:01 | |
that looks back in the mirror every morning. I still can't figure out who he is. |
John actually does qualify. If he asks.(nt), posted on May 24, 2004 at 13:04:14 | |
(nt) |