|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.90.39.24
In Reply to: RE: Dennis, you never answered the question. posted by PakProtector on July 03, 2017 at 11:34:05
I think if he was PP guy he would a uneducated/ignorant PP guy, in much same way as he is a SE guy.
RoTM = run of the mill?
If so then I strongly disagree.
He's SE amp is poorly designed from the power supply to the driver stage to the operating point and load impedance of the output stage.
"Run of the mill" stuff is better than that!
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
Follow Ups:
Hey Tre, wondering if you happen to have a schematic of one of dennis amps?
is this why you said they are poorly designed because you seen his schematic?
Thanks
Lawrence
I have, more or less, seen a schematic.
When I talked to Dennis he indicated that there were a few things that were very close but not spot on.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
I think you may at some point be able to draw reasonable conclusions from a description. High-mu triode, direct coupled to a 2A3 grid paints a fairly solid pic. The admitted frequency response matches this practice.
The description of the PS allows other conclusions to be drawn, and operating responses modeled...:)
cheers,
Douglas
Friend, I would not hurt thee for the world...but thou art standing where I am about to shoot.
Yes, Run of the Mill...:)
It has B+, it has a low mu triode final, and a high mu triode voltage amplifier.
As to implementation, it is set up as a signal processor...again, nothing surprising there, save perhaps the magnitude of the processing.
cheers,
Douglas
Friend, I would not hurt thee for the world...but thou art standing where I am about to shoot.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: