|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
140.99.98.4
In Reply to: RE: The *someone* posted by E-Stat on June 06, 2010 at 08:55:55
That's the President of an International Corporation.Why in heaven's name would you assume he's talking in a technical dimension - guys like, CEOs, presidents, etc., almost exclusively talk in a marketing/sales dimension.
Geez the guys obviously trying to pump his stuff up.
For crying out loud! You really are a goof.
Edits: 06/08/10Follow Ups:
rw
And you are taking the bait hook line and sinker.
Keep going it doesn't change the fact that terms like resolution (not the digital use of the term), transparency or purity are really nothing but subjective observations that appeal to the audiophile.
There's no real engineering dimension to any of these qualities other than whatever a particular designers take is on what characteristics of a design give the proper effect to bring forth such descriptors from listeners.
He remains a recording engineer .
There's no real engineering dimension to any of these qualities other than whatever a particular designers take is...
Actually, it was not Ed Meitner being quoted. It is multiple engineers who chose his equipment as their favored tool.
rw
We still don't know what it is other than claims of high resolution (in the non-digital sense (possibly)), transparency and purity.
It's all open to intrepretation but I think even more obviously RFI and/or noise effects these "dimensions".
Perhaps you should re-read the engineer's comments again. I find their language quite clear.
but I think even more obviously RFI and/or noise effects these "dimensions".
They are most certainly among, but not solely responsible for, the factors which influence the perception of high resolution or transparency.
rw
"They are most certainly among, but not solely responsible for, the factors which influence the perception of high resolution or transparency."
Of course and that's my objection to your applauding Tonys original comment. Resolution (excluding digital resolution) and noise suppression aren't seperate engineering dimensions!
Resolution (excluding digital resolution) and noise suppression aren't seperate engineering dimensions!
You are completely unfamiliar with the concept of linearity as presented by active and passive devices alike and the distortion spectra effects of different circuit topologies.
rw
*not digital resolution
And you can't do it, in fact no one can, as resolution (non-digital) is a not a quantifiable quality, it is a subjective impression.
Here's to waiting for your excuse to not do it.
I am an electrical engineer and am not completely unfamiliar with concepts of linearity and/or distortion, nor am I ignorant to differences between circuit topologies.
Mr. Short Term Memory!I am an electrical engineer and am not completely unfamiliar with concepts of linearity and/or distortion, nor am I ignorant to differences between circuit topologies.
You've successfully fooled all of us.
...it is a subjective impression.
That's the third time you've made that observation. Let's cycle back through your first pass at this brilliant deduction here and my reply. Then, following another *brainstorm*, we went for the second pass and deja vu all over again!
You and Pat D must have really liked Merry-Go-Rounds when you were kids. Sorry, I'm ready to get off. :)
rw
Edits: 06/09/10
but alas like any guy caught in the sheep corral with his pants down there's really no need to even attempt to make an excuse.
Consider yourself outted.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: