|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
141.76.45.35
In Reply to: Why is the onus on us to disprove it for you? posted by Presto on April 10, 2007 at 12:11:35:
nt
Follow Ups:
May Belt:"Why is not Prop Head section inundated with engineers describing THEIR experiences and THEIR sound after trying this technique?"Engineers are supposed to be doing subjective appraisals of tweaks in Propeller Head Plaza according to May Belt. I though PHP was for technical or scientific discussions, and not sharing of subjective appraisals made during uncontrolled and highly biased test conditions.
May Belt: "Over 20 years since it was first described as improving the sound of audio equipment and my questions are even more pertinent than if I had asked them 20 years ago. Precisely because engineers have had plenty of time, in that 20 years, to do all the experiments they would need to do !!!"
Once again - engineers to the rescue. People make claims, but 'some nameless and faceless and unpaid engineers' are supposed to do all the work.
It is the sole responsibility of the individual(s) making the claim to provide supporting evidence and refute any contradictory evidence NOT those who may doubt the accuracy of the claim.
Why is this so hard for people to understand?
> > > "Engineers are supposed to be doing subjective appraisals of tweaks in Propeller Head Plaza according to May Belt. I though PHP was for technical or scientific discussions, and not sharing of subjective appraisals made during uncontrolled and highly biased test conditions." < < <Excuse me Presto but these 'engineers' are making AUDIO equipment - equipment for people to listen to - to get pleasure from listening to music - not merely making microwave ovens (although I must admit, microwave ovens are really quite technically amazing) !!
May:Audio engineers or not, they are not required to substantiate claims that you are making. Only YOU can substantiate ON THIS FORUM the claims YOU are putting forth ON THIS FORUM.
You seem to only want to talk about tweaks that are:
A) Born of accident, trial-and-error, or some mystical secret
B) Substantiated or validated with only uncontrolled listening tests and beliefNeither of these things are ever going to be accepted here, and the sooner realize that, the sooner you can find a more suitable environment for your posts.
And I guarantee that once you do, the personal attacks, derisive posts, and rude comments will all cease immediately.
nt
Posey:I do not value the advancement of audio heh? Ah, but what a subtle but deep deep dig that was Posey! Very well done! You're such a card. But I am afraid that I've forgotten more about audio and audio engineering concepts than you'll ever know in your entire lifetime.
Seriously though, I would take a substantial break and perhaps spend less time typing and more time reading and researching so that perhaps ONE DAY, you might have learned enough to be a valuable contributor to this forum. Then again, being a shill for May Belt and PWB Electronics is really a good "job" for you, seeing as how all it requires is a big mouth and a grating personality. You're overqualified really...
Poor poor lonely Posey Rorer.
I do hope May will be your friend after all you've gone through for her. Really I do.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: