|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
184.7.81.34
If you had only one choice, which cd of the Goldberg Variations would you get? Thanks, JD ii
Follow Ups:
I'd probably choose Sergei Schepkin's remake, if you can find it. If not, Dershavina or Koroliov.
nt
And if you listen to CDs, I would get "A State of Wonder", which includes both of Gould's recordings, and an interesting interview with Gould.
Sounding far better than the original digital LP release.
Even better is the recent *analogue* master reissue from Analog Spark a few years back taking the same analogue tape and finally releasing it in a *proper* format. :)
My intro to Gould's way (really ways) with the Goldbergs was with this CD set, but I bought the analog LP when it was released.
I prefer the 81 performance over the more famous 55 - feels more "baroque" to me.
Sony used the digital tape to make the master. Digital technology was so new at that time, Sony ran both the digital and analogue tape * just in case* at the time of recording.
The State of Wonder CD was made with the original *analogue* master. Not the digital.
The recent reissue by Analogue Spark used the same analogue tape to make the record.
Oddly the worst sounding out of all three are the original vinyl release with digital tape as a master. I also have the Legacy series box set (digital version ) and they don't sound as good as either the analogue sourced State of the Wonder CD or Analogue Spark reissue.
btw, I agree with you. I also prefer his later '81 set.
only one? Not possible.
Ton Koopman on harpsichord.
A few here I haven't heard; will have to follow up on them.
Recorded in 2006 by Zenph/Sony, with a Yamaha concert grand and their hardware/software playing a recreation based on the 1955 tapes.
WW
"A man need merely light the filaments of his receiving set and the world's greatest artists will perform for him." Alfred N. Goldsmith, RCA, 1922
They do call it that, but I don't like it. I think it misrepresents Gould's intentions because the sound of the Yamaha piano and the more generous acoustic in which the "re-performance" was recorded are quite different than the 1955 Gould original.
Also, I have some suspicions that "reperformance" wasn't as faithful as it was billed. On the Rachmaninoff Zenph "reperformance," a lot of rhythmic subtlety that you hear on those scratchy 78s is gone.
I hear so much MORE in the Zenph re-performances in terms of color and escape from the 1955 technical limitations that it perhaps deafens me to whatever rhythmic subtlety (if any!) might be lost. ;-)Also, I don't believe that all the aspects of the 1955 recording are necessarily representative of Gould's intentions. Sure, the original recording is close and dry, but so are a lot of other Columbia piano recordings from the early to mid fifties. This was Gould's first commercial recording - who says he had the level of control over the recording environment which he had later, once he'd become a superstar? Maybe he just took what he got in this instance. In addition, when the '55 performance was re-issued on the first CD reissue, with its "super bit mapping", I was surprised by how much more I could hear the studio reverberation, compared to the original LP, where it was somewhat buried in surface noise and tape hiss.
Edits: 03/26/17
Gosh - She may have more CD's than I do!I've lived with her recording for about 20 years now and it has really stood the test of time for me. Sure, I like both the Gould studio performances too (and I like that Yamaha piano he used on the later one), and the Perahia performance certainly has to be one of the best things he's ever done on recording. And the Weissenberg EMI recording is certainly interesting at the very least. Garrick Ohlsson's performance is VERY fine (and it's one that probably gets overlooked). I still like Dershavina best of all.
Edits: 03/25/17
only used on Amazon, and $38 at that.
Still starting at $18 used though. It's also available as a download at Presto Classical in the UK - but unfortunately not for US customers! The transliteration of her last name sometimes appears as Derzhavina rather than Dershavina (if you were thinking of searching on other sites).
But not TIDAL.
Haydn and Bach French Suites are on Spotify.
I like Dershavina's, too. I wish she would make more recordings. Her Haydn sonatas aren't as good as the Goldbergs, though.
I have her Bach French Suites (which I like a lot!) and Medtner albums. It looks as if she just released a new album earlier this month - of Stanchinsky's piano music. I saw it on the Presto Classical and Amazon UK sites, not the Amazon US site - it may also be available on the Target (!) site, although the album cover doesn't show up in that listing.
If you like Scriabin's music, you'll love Stanchinsky's. His very small output may have had something to do with the fact that he was subject to delusions. (And, yes, some of his music can sound every bit as creepy as some of Scriabin's!) He was found dead at the age of 26 after he had gone on a walk - possible suicide, although no one knows for sure.
My new favorite is Beatrice Rana interpretation, it is just so right.
Sure I still like Gould 1981 version and Koopman on the harpsichord.
When I listen to Beatrice new version I feel obliged to listen to the complete work, it is just so good.
BTW it is available on Tidal, so check it out!!
Only Kempff would get away with doing his own improve by skipping
the trills playing it straight up. :) Frank and natural, there is a certain ease, almost
Gulda like sense of casualness. His style provokes a jazz piano player more than
classically trained one. ( Ironically much better spirited than Jarret's stiff cembalo Goldberg ) Certainly more relaxed and less uptight and much freer than
most.
.
Edits: 03/24/17
nt
.
In particular, Pierre Hantai's first traversal, which you picture, is one of the best examples of recorded harpsichord sound I've ever heard. We might soften the hearts of the anti-HIP crowd if all harpsichord recordings were that good.
I'm in what is probably a small minority of those who prefer Glenn Gould's second take to his first.
For another surprisingly compelling piano version, check out Kimiko Ishizaka. Her 24/96 download was available for free, don't know if it still is, but her prices are low.
I listened to a couple of sample tracks and they do sound promising and well recorded.
Played on a real piano [for a change].
Severius! Supremus Invictus
There are actually two Weissenberg recordings. One of them has had umpteen different issues on CD, but the one I prefer is coupled with his complete recording of the Partitas, linked below.
I like both, although neither would be my first choice - a little too percussive and often a bit rushed and rough around the edges.
I actually hate the Baroque. But, I've made myself listen to this, and a bit of other Bach.
Thanks.
Severius! Supremus Invictus
Perahia for Piano, Robert Hill for harpsichord.
The last recording of the variations by Glenn Gould (circa 1981).
.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: