Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
24.16.182.213
In Reply to: RE: It's not the watts, it's current.... posted by Rod M on August 06, 2020 at 09:08:36
You're not addressing Tre's point.
You said "it's not the watts......"
Yet, in your real-world example, you're clearly showing it IS the watts (de-rating.)
If power amplifier current capability de-rates at lower impedance loads then, by definition, so does the wattage capability.
Dave.
Follow Ups:
Yes, and that was my point entirely. All 100 watt amps are not equal. Having to de-rate their amp points toward a lesser power supply that can't handle difficult loads.
-Rod
"All 100 watt amps are not equal."
You can say that again, and in many different ways.
A lot of SS amplifiers have lower distortion at 2 watts vs. .2 watts. The problem with that is, with most speakers, we listen to .2 watts a lot more of the time vs. 2 watts.
To your point, an amplifier that can not double it's output watts each time the load impedance is halved is showing a lack of current delivery ability.
I would have said it like this, 'It's not the rated watts into 8 ohms that matters so much when we are talking about driving speakers that have an impedance curve that dips well below 8 ohms, it's the wattage rating of the amplifier when driving those lower impedances vs. the wattage rating into 8 ohms'
That says what you were trying to say without making it sound like 'watts and current' can be separated.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
I tend to over simplify.
What would you call an amp that can double down to 2 ohms, a high current amp?
-Rod
An amplifier with a really good power supply and plenty of heat sink.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: