|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
73.236.194.50
In Reply to: RE: "It's important to note that so far there is no direct evidence for either theory. " posted by Ivan303 on June 01, 2021 at 14:58:39
I tend to agree that the virus is of natural origin--there's lots of nasty stuff out there in nature that we haven't encountered yet. However, I also firmly believe that it was under study at the Institute of Virology and they had an "accident" that released it into the public.
It is just far too "coincidental" that the initially reported outbreak occurred in the immediate vicinity of China's ONLY Level 4 biohazard lab, that has acknowledged and is known for working with various coronaviruses.
I also firmly believe that the initial "accident" and subsequent outbreak occurred in October 2019, but was not acknowledged until the end of December--after it had gotten out of control, and could no longer be ignored/hidden. By the time the world was notified, the virus had a 3-month head-start, which I consider to be a significant factor in it becoming a global pandemic.
Not hatin', just sayin'...
"So I talk to the night, I head for the light, try and hold it on the road. Thank God for the man who put
the white lines on the highway"--a very dear friend for decades Michael Stanley (Gee)--RIP
Follow Ups:
And, additionally, the first vector identified was a human. Yet, the majority of elite science experts just turned a blind eye to these "coincidences", and displayed no science curiosity or intellectual rigor in considering the lab origin theory.Hmmm. You have to wonder why. At the very least.
Edits: 06/03/21
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: