High Efficiency Speaker Asylum

• Re: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. Frank W 14:51:43 01/12/01 (1)
  In Reply to: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Romy on January 10, 2001 at 17:07:42:

  Romy,

  Following Kurt's tip (a belated thank you Kurt) I now angle my Trios down. They are supported by a mixture of natural cork and synthetic cork from some great wine - and despite my dear wifelet's disapproval I just had to 'wet the bottom of the glass' to get the corks... ah such is life.

  Once sober, the sound is to me ears, more coherant and focused.

  Regards

  FW

  
  
  

  ---

  • Re: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. Romy 14:58:25 01/12/01 (0)
    In Reply to: Re: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Frank W on January 12, 2001 at 14:51:43:

    Frank,

    it’s perfectly fine to angle the entire Trio in the any direction you wish. My comment was about the angling the individual horns relative to each other…

    Rgds,
    The Cat
    
    
    

    ---
• BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA (nt) Rich 16:05:06 01/11/01 (0)
  In Reply to: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Romy on January 10, 2001 at 17:07:42:

  
  
  
  

  ---
• Romy, do you have a drinking problem? Willie The Squid 13:55:39 01/11/01 (0)
  In Reply to: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Romy on January 10, 2001 at 17:07:42:

  NT
  
  

  ---
• It's bad advice to stop people from harmless experimentation. Kurt Strain 09:18:04 01/11/01 (0)
  In Reply to: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Romy on January 10, 2001 at 17:07:42:

  And I do angle my Duo's horns. He got that idea from me. And no, there's nothing else "wrong" with my system.

  Kurt
  
  

  ---
• Re: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. wgeiger 08:44:38 01/11/01 (0)
  In Reply to: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Romy on January 10, 2001 at 17:07:42:

  Hi Folks,

  So much horse design by committee will get you a camel every time, impregnated or not. Off course, that would take yet another “meeting”. No sympathy for the poor camel either.

  Regards,

  WHG
  
  
  

  ---
• maybe camel spit can damp speaker resonance's morinix 21:10:56 01/10/01 (0)
  In Reply to: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Romy on January 10, 2001 at 17:07:42:

  I mean let's not waste valuable resources.

  Hi Romy
  Robert"heavy duty morinix" Morin
  
  

  ---
• Re: Tom §. 19:23:48 01/10/01 (0)
  In Reply to: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Romy on January 10, 2001 at 17:07:42:

  > > due to the fragile moderations could delete my post because it violate their "easy damageable” ego < <

  I'm the mod here, Romy. You needn't worry about that.

  All I'm concerned about is how you impregnated that poor camel.
  
  Tom §.
  
  

  ---
• Re: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. Mike Bates 18:26:27 01/10/01 (0)
  In Reply to: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Romy on January 10, 2001 at 17:07:42:

  Yeah right. So maybe he is 3" taller than you or his chair or ears are at a different level in relationship to the speakers. You are totally wrong cat man.

  Please refrain from posting this kind of kitty poop.

  Mike

  PS Where'd you find a litter box big enough for that camel? : ^ )

  
  
  

  ---
• Wow! Wayne_Parham 17:45:16 01/10/01 (0)
  In Reply to: Who are the “reviewers” or an open letter to Steve Rochlin and the rest Avantgarde's folks. posted by Romy on January 10, 2001 at 17:07:42:

  Hi Romy!

  You wrote:

  [Something about impregnating camels who urinate inappropriately]

  Wow! Ha! That's funny, Funny, FUNNY!!! I dunno what happened here, but that's the funniest post I think I've ever seen.

  But, Man, That camel didn't short out anything, did it? 'Cause I've always hated how subjective this stuff is and all - not many quantify things or anything - But one can certainly quantify the amount a camel urinates and they can physically see damage as a result!

  It's easy to build a bad sounding loudspeaker that doesn't damage itself but not easy to keep a urine-soaked-stereo system from smoking!

  Anyway, that was COOL!

  And - whoever you are - don't worry 'bout it. People says tons of stuff 'bout stereo stuff. I always hated that too, but it ain't nothin'!

  [It was none of my business. But that was just too funny!]

  Wayne
  
  

  ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Parts Connexion

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---