|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.214.238.65
In Reply to: RE: Aesthetics aside... posted by E-Stat on May 17, 2021 at 10:18:26
But I agree that these new ones are ugly.
Follow Ups:
Didn't the C2500 replace a SS model?
The C 2500 replaced the C 2300 Tube Pre.
I have the C 2600.
I also have a MA 6900 SS In Amp that sounds good.
Don't know about opamps.
Not everyone likes Mac gear, but not me!
The SS Pre's have smaller Numbers, C 50 is the current SS Pre.
My gear has the old Look, Glass Face Plate, Meters, Lights,
the old Mac-Stack style.
Tho my MC 275 Tube Amp is just a Metal Box with Transformers and Tubes, no Meters or Lighted Logo.
Edits: 05/21/21
I'm well aware of that.The C 2500 replaced the C 2300 Tube Pre. I have the C 2600.
I was referring to the C46 that you mention here . My, four preamps since 2013!
Don't know about opamps.
Sure you do as the C46 used 25(!) of them. I can fully understand your reaction when it was replaced:
"So much better it's ridiculous!"
They recently added a tube phono preamp and perhaps one day will also add a DAC with a tube analog output stage. You might have the same reaction again. ;)
Edits: 05/22/21
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: