|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
192.42.240.245
In Reply to: Denon 2910 vs 3910 for audio posted by BobH on April 19, 2007 at 16:28:10:
I love my 3910.... I put it head to head with the 2910 at the dealer. The 3910 had much better imaging and delivered a fantastic soundstage. I think the DACs are much more linear and sounded more 'analog' if that makes any sense. I owned a Denon 1650ar before the 3910 which had some proprietary circuitry: the alpha processor. The 3910 has some additional processing as well 'Al24 processing plus.' Whatever it does, it kicks ass. I spent the additional $400 and I'm not sorry for it one bit. Click below....
Follow Ups:
I have to second Bob's impressions. I had the 2930, traded up to the 3930. Audio DACS are the same as the 2910/3910 IIRC.Bigger, better soundstage is the biggest difference. The bass is more solid and better defined too, though that's not as noticable as the soundstaging to my ears
I auditioned the 2930 and it wasn't bad but that player is double the cost of the DVD1920 universal I have and not worth it IMHO. I do have other SACD players, the 1920 is used mostly for video and I have to admit though the 2930 was not broken in whatsoever. The 3930 costs that much more than the 2930 and I was about to consider it for that price.
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: