|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
I didn't find reviews on either of these over at sa-cdinfo.com. Anyone have these? Comments on the sound quality and how the mch mixes are?
Follow Ups:
I just did a comparison of the SACD layer to the CD layer of the "Move it on Over" disk. First off taking into account that this is an early blues/rock recording quality probably was not high on the list so the dynamics kind of suck on both layers.
On the SACD layer I find the bass more tuneful and noticable what little there is. Georges guitar has more of its lower fundamental frequencies and harmonics intact which sounds definitely richer and much fuller. On the CD layer his guitar seems to have a lot more upper treble energy that is anoying and edgy prompting the volume to be reduced which is not the way to listen to George. I definitley find the SACD layer more listenable and enjoyable especially at higher listening levels.
...was it your player?I've heard this sort of description of the difference between the CD and SACD layer from other people quite often; yet in many cases I don't hear the same thing.
One possible reason is that my Redbook CD rig is top-notch, to the point where an SACD must be truly head-and-shoulders above its CD cousin to make a noticeable difference on my system. It's been my experience when auditioning or listening to various SACD players that the emphasis is on SACD playback; their Redbook playback is usually somewhat inferior to their SACD playback.
Could this be why you found the SACD layer to be better than the CD layer; whereas I found them to be too similar to make the SACD layer stand out?
my player is a SA-14. I know its red book is not up to the level of its SACD performance but it does not totally suck either. The rest of my system/room is definitely way better than the SA-14 so any differences to be heard are readily apparent the good and the bad. I had a Teac DV-50 in the system for a day with some friends and my general impression between CD and SACD still would apply there as well.I have also noticed over the years that different people hear different things in different ways and respond accordingly. What stands out for one person is a wash for another. As an example a bud and I were listening to an external dac a few weeks ago on the system and he liked what he heard and decribed the presentation as cozy and warm. I did not get that impresssion at all. I found the DAC rolled off and very flat sounding with no dynamics. Go figure ?? I have also noticed that some guys tend to build systems that make all recordings sound similar or shall I use the word pleasing and in the process their system can not clearly show the differences between formats or recordings.
I have listened to top notch (hyper expensive Levinson, Wadia, Theta Digital)red book performance on various occassions for hours at a time and I have yet to hear what SACD does on such a regular and effortless basis. I know having a better red book player would tighten the gap in certain areas of performance but I do not think it can make up for a format which just does not have the data in the bits to begin with.
One of my next upgrades I want to entertain is a better front end to bring it in line with the rest of the system but I still do not see a all in one player (CD/SACD) that is substantially better than the SA-14 to justify the 5-8K investment at this point. Maybe in a year or two when more quality universal players start to become the norm I hope.
I don't think there's any real difference between the CD layer and the SACD layer. The original LPs weren't recorded all that well, and the remaster didn't improve anything in that regard.
Thanks. I've never owned any George before, so I suppose it wouldn't be a waste for me to get the SACD's if the music is good, and I like what stuff of his I know. Maybe I'll just look for some cheap LP's instead.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: