|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
75.215.30.35
In Reply to: RE: Question for legal types, how close is this to universal satisfaction, World Wide?... posted by Wellfed on June 28, 2007 at 21:54:07
I did a Google search on snippets of the "testimonials", and nothing came up.
I only do this because some testimonials are actually copied from forum sites. Apparently not the case here.
I'd take it as a case of "A tree fell in the forest." I personally take stuff like this with skepticism.
But if one wants to blow three grand on a bunch of doses of the tweak, it's his prerogative. My only comment is "Caveat Emptor."
And if the tweak actually does work, maybe MD ought to improve its marketing tactics. For most people are taking them as sales pitches for snake oil.
Follow Ups:
It's a universal, timeless personality-type. Remember what they said about heavier-than-air flight?
clark
Surely you don't equate Geoff's efforts with those of the Wright Bros., et al? Or, as you posit in another post, Tesla? It makes you look foolish, laddie.
-RW-
...is the inanity of the knee-jerk reactions against those, and against Machina Dynamica products. Like I said, there's a personality type that prefers to engage in derision and disdain, rather than carry on with something useful like the rest of us.
Two or three years ago I wrote up the MD Intelligent Chip, including accurate, honest reports of how everybody (minus two) who tried it, heard it and liked it -- and even went and bought some of their own. Still the sneering continues.
clark
... products that defy all logic not to mention physic from the known universe !!??
The former is a direct result of the presence of the latter, its as simple as that.
It may *raise* the question, but it doesn't "beg" it. (See URL for correct usage.)
That said, what proof do you offer that MD products are "snake oil" (whatever that is)? Experimental evidence? Published reports?
As for "products that defy all logic", there have been plenty of those already! I'll mention only radio, boats that sail into the wind, and Paris Hilton.
clark
...longer than people have been arguing whether heavier-than-air flight was possible... They KNEW it was possible with proof in the skies.
Come'on! Use a better argument please.
d
Only that history has a way of remembering points of views that were spectacularly wrong (or right)... doesn't point to the view of the majority of intelligentsia at the time. An example;
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." - Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943.
Following your argument, one would be led to believe that Mr. Watson's view was the prevalent view at the time (perhaps it was, among the uneducated)... But we all know that NOT to be the case among other people in the industry at the time.
Will you please stop dredging up the past to prove the present. If for no other reason, stop with the logical fallacies.
You want I should dredge up the future?
Guess that "personality type" remark got your goat.
clark
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: