|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
73.19.55.31
In Reply to: RE: Ordered some..will see (nt) posted by TanteJuut on October 18, 2020 at 04:04:21
I found some information about the tweak and don't agree with the premise. I discontinued reading when the single grounding point of a Faraday cage seemed to be a disagreeable thing. The image shown above is involved with a metal outdoor shed that acts as a Faraday cage. It's a single ground wire with a strap to be attached to a metal pipe or rod as an earth ground. Affixing yet another wire to the braided shield of a cable and attaching it someplace where it does not belong might be a measurable thing, but it's not a Faraday cage which has been successfully implemented by just about any field of interest for the purpose. If the fellow wants to fiddle with such a thing, there should be no unreasonable claim of superiority vs. a classic Faraday cage, IMO.
Follow Ups:
The closed loop of the shield wire is responsible for the noise reduction effect and creating an effective faraday cage. A lot of folks on the computer audiophile website reported the same effect in their systems. If you want an explanation from me or you just want to say that you are not (scientifically) convinced, then I am fine with that. That happens always with audiophiles. I shared my experience & I am happy with the results. Enjoy your sunday.
Juut.
Audiophiles are a curious bunchThey 'believe' better sound is achievable, as evidenced by their constant buying [upgrading, tweaking etc]....but are never convinced when someone claims to have achieved better sound.
In essence they believe something to be true, but deny anyone who claims to have actually made it happen.
Then there are those who can imagine better sound just by reading numbers. I even read a post where someone could actually here jitter in the Pico-seconds....ie That is one trillionth, or one millionth of one millionth of a second, or 0.000 000 000 001 seconds.
Amazing!!!For example, these days your Dac is crap if it doesn't have a "Femto-second" clock. DACs with clocks with only accuracy in the Pico-seconds just don't sound as good due to all that nasty jitter. People will swear they can easily hear a Femtosecond clock vs a Picosecond clock. Femtosecond - A femtosecond is equal to 1000 attoseconds, or 1/1000 picosecond...wow! Imagine that!!! 50+ year old ears that can hear that well, when hearing only gets worse with age. I'd imagine they could hear so well at 20yr old that they could hear what people were thinking.
And wire is another story....6N silver all over the place....which is actually purer than anyone can achieve. But hey, an Audiophile can easily hear the difference between 4N [probably the most expensive and purest] vs the magical 6N.
Dynobots Audio - Music is the Bridge Between Heaven and Earth
Edits: 10/18/20 10/18/20
I am not making a claim. I have said already that I have personal hypothesis about this subject. And that is currently the right position for my point of view. Calling it fiddling is belittling. Swenson and the folks on ASR and Computer Audiophile are also thumbling around this subject and there are some great engineers that can not explain nor measure the effect either. I know that Phasure USB is going over the top with multiple interconnected shields (and getting good reviews)
By connecting a thin wire between the end points of the braid you form a closed circuit for a small (internal or external induced) current to flow. That is a different connection scheme from the floating shield, or 1 point type of shielding strategy that we all have used for a long time. Is it shunting/shorting what is causing the effect? Is it the breaking of the leakage current between components? Is it reduced antenna effect, is the RFI trapped in the loop? Is the shield charged by the small electric current and therefore acting as a better kind of shield? I am also interested in good answers, as I like explanations myself, but for the moment I am happy fiddling around.
Saying this is a forum is correct, but I am not obligated to have a discussion nor answering questions from anyone who make subjective remarks a lot of the time (connector a, plating b, cable c etc..).
Cheers Juut
Your hypothesis is as good as any.
You don't need a White-Paper or Peer-Reviewed scientific evidence supported by an elite group of scientists, along with published peer-reviewed journals.
If it works it works...30% of men respond to a placebo vs Viagra, can't tell those 30% the wood isn't real.
If it works it works.
I've experimented with various things over the years, some with very positive results. I don't even bother to share, due to all the negativism...I just enjoy it myself and move on.
Dynobots Audio - Music is the Bridge Between Heaven and Earth
Where can I buy those placebo pills!
A Foolish Inconsistency Is The Hobgoblin Of Little Minds- Alfred E. Neuman
This is also appropriate for the Audiophiles...seeking improvements
LOL!!
The Internet[s]
Dynobots Audio - Music is the Bridge Between Heaven and Earth
Edits: 10/19/20
Juut,
This is an audio forum where matters like this are discussed. I'm not trying to personally give you a hard time, I'm questioning a tweak that is said to be an effective Faraday cage. A Faraday cage is already effective. I'm not one to hold a banner of science up in the air since I tend to be a subjectivist, but to postulate that a conventional Faraday cage is not effective, and that the notion of a closed loop was somehow missed by electrical engineers for many decades now is an extraordinary claim. If you would rather not discuss the matter, that is your prerogative.
Maybe someone else will take a look at the claim. Have a nice Sunday, too.
Cheers, Duster
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: