|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
174.64.173.41
In Reply to: RE: Musings on passive vs active preamp with tube buffer stage posted by tketcham on February 21, 2021 at 08:08:36
I do not have a Schitt Freya, but I have had a lot of active preamps. I am now using a buffer preamp which includes two solid state buffers and a tube buffer. I kind of agree with the other responses in the sense that (you can switch between them on the fly), the tube buffer does not create a "tube" sound. The soundstages are different, and the sound (forward vs behind the speakers) is different, and some bass impact is different, but when I go from SS to tube, no one has ever said "ahh, that must be the tube circuit" or "aha, we went from tube to ss". It is a very interesting experiment.
I like the buffer better than most active preamps I have owned.
I linked to a post about my preamp below.
Follow Ups:
The sound with the passive Freya S and iTube2 doesn't have the bloom that the tube preamp I used for a few years had, that's for sure. But I do like the sound and the dependability of the SS preamp/buffer combination. I guess I'll have to keep looking for a true(?) tube buffer stage.Tom
Edits: 02/22/21
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: