RE: But . . .

RE: But . . .

Posted by rbolaw on June 4, 2012 at 11:10:40

In Reply to: But . . . posted by Langdell on May 31, 2012 at 19:59:43:

All true. In fact, the CD is already obsolete even as a backup medium, but the mainstream music industry is very slow to make the most of the latest technology.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Bromo33333 12:18:09 05/31/12 (12)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Munkie_NL 03:48:12 06/01/12 (0)

Tom's posts here sometimes... - rebop 19:17:14 05/31/12 (1)

RE: Tom's posts here sometimes... - tom.dennehy 13:48:05 06/30/12 (0)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - dinchart 16:59:46 05/31/12 (0)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Time_Stands_Still 14:21:14 05/31/12 (5)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Tao 20:40:39 05/31/12 (0)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - phlogiston 14:59:18 05/31/12 (0)

Exactly. And that is why the CD still lives. - rbolaw 14:53:15 05/31/12 (2)

But . . . - Langdell 19:59:43 05/31/12 (1)

RE: But . . . - rbolaw 11:10:40 06/04/12 (0)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - MillHouse1835@aol.com 13:57:10 05/31/12 (1)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Bromo33333 14:17:24 05/31/12 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: But . . . - rbolaw 11:10:40 06/04/12 (0)

Post a Message!