Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: UL code posted by jea48 on July 27, 2017 at 15:08:14:
I don't see any exclusion for our type uses anywhere I look. Here is what Cooper Bussman has to say. They state the standards discussed (300%) and then say it may not be adequate protection. I think I'm done. I getting a headache. While 300% looks to be the standard it looks like you, I and Bussmann think 300% is pushing it. They like the 125% thing. T456
Edits: 07/27/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: UL code - Tweaker456 16:03:42 07/27/17 (0)