Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: If you had taken the time posted by Tweaker456 on May 22, 2017 at 09:30:13:
You didn't mention the specific cap in the text.
I guess he thought you would follow the provided link to view the suggested cap. That's what I did.
I read that they are not UL approved.
Then you didn't click the link he provided. Here again is the data sheet. Note text on the right column where you find:
"These encapsulated devices also meet the flame test requirements outlined in UL Standard 94V-0."
Speed reading doesn't always work very well. :)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Gee - E-Stat 14:33:41 05/25/17 (2)
- RE: Gee - Tweaker456 18:09:42 05/25/17 (1)
- I merely made two points - E-Stat 18:24:56 05/25/17 (0)