In Reply to: RE: Ohms question posted by Tadlo on March 4, 2021 at 14:39:23:
Very close. I prefer the 3 a little more. I can't explain why other then to say it seems to do everything a little better then the 3a. Goes a little deeper, has a bit better mid. The 3 has a different crossover point then the 3a, and both were restored by different individuals. Perhaps it's that. I don't know. My 3a is early and has the same 12" cloth woofer that the 3 has.Can't go wrong with either, IMO, assuming proper restoration and proper amplification. They are not the easiest speakers to drive.
Edits: 03/04/21
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Ohms question - sberger 15:34:29 03/04/21 (3)
- Just a thought - Bill the K 04:06:04 03/05/21 (2)
- RE: Just a thought - sberger 06:04:42 03/05/21 (1)
- RE: Just a thought - Bill the K 19:03:49 03/05/21 (0)