In Reply to: RE: my answer is more of an explanation posted by Presto on August 2, 2012 at 09:09:28:
than it needs to be. but by now you should be getting the idea now. it's hard to quantify what you are talking about but i am sure there are math guys out there that would be able to.
suffice it to say that if the satellites don't have to try to do the work of reproducing the lowest freqs, they are free to play a lot louder without strain or be in danger of damage.
...regards...tr
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- you're making this more complicated - hifitommy 16:05:01 08/02/12 (13)
- RE: you're making this more complicated - Presto 00:59:34 08/03/12 (0)
- Satellites? - Sumflow 20:59:10 08/02/12 (11)
- Satellites - hifitommy 22:14:15 08/02/12 (10)
- Satellite speakers - Sumflow 02:53:09 08/03/12 (0)
- RE: Satellites - Sumflow 00:24:12 08/03/12 (8)
- i reiterate---- - hifitommy 05:50:46 08/03/12 (7)
- Hidden source - Sumflow 07:24:10 08/03/12 (6)
- RE: Hidden source - abs1 14:28:15 08/03/12 (5)
- Satellite - Sumflow 14:16:09 08/16/12 (2)
- Joke - Sumflow 15:08:09 08/16/12 (0)
- RE: Satellite - abs1 15:04:14 08/16/12 (0)
- you guys are spot on about Summy - hifitommy 12:29:05 08/04/12 (0)
- But...Sumflow had several pictures he had to post! - willkayakforfood 14:51:42 08/03/12 (0)