In Reply to: Psychoacoustics... posted by mkuller on April 19, 2007 at 11:04:41:
Assuming that's true, does anyone know what this effect is based on, since we really can't hear that part of the bandwidth?TL
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- But why? - tlyyra 17:12:27 04/19/07 (35)
- Thanks for the good pointers - tlyyra 11:27:11 04/20/07 (0)
- Try here... - mkuller 19:58:05 04/19/07 (28)
- Dumb Study - Richard BassNut Greene 12:48:01 04/20/07 (27)
- You didn't read it - tlyyra 14:06:59 04/20/07 (24)
- Re: it's frequently cited in serious studies - KlausR. 07:56:30 04/21/07 (8)
- Oohashi - tlyyra 11:28:47 04/21/07 (7)
- Re: Oohashi - Kal Rubinson 15:00:37 04/24/07 (4)
- Not so fast - tlyyra 09:01:10 04/25/07 (3)
- Right: Not so fast - Kal Rubinson 14:07:10 04/25/07 (2)
- Re: Right: Not so fast - tlyyra 16:54:08 04/25/07 (1)
- Re: Right: Not so fast - Kal Rubinson 18:50:12 04/25/07 (0)
- Re: Oohashi - KlausR. 08:30:47 04/22/07 (1)
- Some refs. - tlyyra 13:37:34 04/22/07 (0)
- Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - Richard BassNut Greene 07:26:28 04/21/07 (14)
- Re: Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - morricab 08:05:11 04/25/07 (1)
- Brain scans are not proxies for what we hear when listening to music - Richard BassNut Greene 08:32:32 04/25/07 (0)
- Re: Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - David Aiken 13:53:27 04/21/07 (11)
- Frequencies below 15kHz. mask the audibility of frequencies above 15kHz. assuming they are audible at all - Richard BassNut Greene 07:57:50 04/23/07 (10)
- Re: Frequencies below 15kHz. mask the audibility of frequencies above 15kHz. assuming they are audible at all - David Aiken 14:04:51 04/23/07 (9)
- Where are the data to prove listeners could hear a difference with and w/o the ultra high frequencies? - Richard BassNut Greene 09:38:35 04/24/07 (8)
- Are these biases? - David Aiken 19:00:57 04/24/07 (7)
- They are if the study is to correlate with people visiting this website and the typical music they listen to - Richard BassNut Greene 08:46:36 04/25/07 (4)
- Re: They are if the study is to correlate with people visiting this website and the typical music they listen to - David Aiken 16:37:15 04/26/07 (3)
- Because the study results were used by someone here to support the purchase of supertweeters by someone else here! - Richard BassNut Greene 07:38:53 04/28/07 (1)
- Re: Because the study results were used by someone here to support the purchase of supertweeters by someone else here! - David Aiken 13:31:08 04/28/07 (0)
- Like we used to say in the seminary - tlyyra 01:20:24 04/27/07 (0)
- Re: Are these biases? - morricab 08:01:55 04/25/07 (0)
- Exactly - tlyyra 01:28:16 04/25/07 (0)
- Re: Dumb Post - Sordidman 14:06:03 04/20/07 (1)
- "No one can prove anything" is your brilliant conclusion? - Richard BassNut Greene 07:18:55 04/21/07 (0)
- Re: But why? - Pat D 18:27:19 04/19/07 (3)
- Re : intermodulation - KlausR. 08:33:01 04/21/07 (1)
- Re: Re : intermodulation - Pat D 17:24:28 04/23/07 (0)
- Excellent point from a good source. - Richard BassNut Greene 07:28:15 04/21/07 (0)
- Re: But why? - 20Hz 18:21:53 04/19/07 (0)