|
Music Lane It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes. |
|
|
|
Music Lane It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes. |
|
In Reply to: Toscanini in hi-res! posted by Russell on July 8, 2017 at 18:02:53:
It just seems like overkill.
That's not to say that the remastering might not sound better, but I strongly suspect that the use of 24/96 PCM will be a somewhat trivial factor in the sonic improvement (assuming an improvement is indeed detected). ;-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Same thing I felt with the 24/96 remasterings of the mono Callas recordings - Chris from Lafayette 21:28:36 07/08/17 (12)
- One word: better liquidity. nt - jdaniel@jps.net 21:52:46 07/08/17 (11)
- Posted with no sense of irony... - Ivan303 06:30:31 07/09/17 (1)
- : ) nt - jdaniel@jps.net 07:49:55 07/09/17 (0)
- No. (That's two words anyway!) [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 23:53:04 07/08/17 (0)
- RE: One word: better liquidity. nt - ahendler 22:20:44 07/08/17 (7)
- Maybe it's better mastering, but there's certainly more "there" there when comparing EMI's "historic" CD with - jdaniel@jps.net 07:49:38 07/09/17 (6)
- I don't necessarily disagree - Chris from Lafayette 09:43:25 07/09/17 (5)
- RE: I don't necessarily disagree - PAR 14:59:26 07/09/17 (4)
- They have the ability, they just don't know it. :-) /n - Ivan303 20:00:30 07/10/17 (1)
- On what ? - Ross 18:21:52 07/11/17 (0)
- As I've posted before. . . - Chris from Lafayette 01:03:40 07/10/17 (0)
- RE: I don't necessarily disagree - Travis 18:21:17 07/09/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
