In Reply to: Since when is 95% a distortion of 95%? posted by Analog Scott on June 12, 2012 at 22:35:12:
95 percent of music being lip-synced is not the same as 95 percent of pop music being lip-synced or played back.............
>> Personally, if I thought he exaggerated the number, which might be the case, I'd maybe question the number....... But IMO, he's nailed the problem with most popular music today, exaggerated or not.>>
"The problem?" really this is "he" problem?
You think it's *not* a problem? I think it's a terminal problem! A grave problem...... The entertainment is trying to pass faked music as real. That's not a problem??
Either you think he exaggerated the number or you don't think he exaggerated the number. Which is it. I think he pulled it out of his ass and it is way off.
A fair opinion....... You might be right..... But I think trying to split hairs over the details digresses to the fact it's a terminal problem. That's my point.
>>From me personally, what I find disappointing is the militant attitude from those either defending or denying the practice of faking performance.......>>
And who here is actually doing that?
You think you're not actually doing that?
Smells like a burning straw mane to me.
So what is the reality, from your perspective? I'm open eyes and ears. Thank you.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- When the Context Is Changed.............................. - Todd Krieger 17:26:10 06/13/12 (2)
- RE: When the Context Is Changed.............................. - Analog Scott 20:58:13 06/13/12 (1)
- Fine - Whatever - Time To Move On [nt] - Mike Porper 08:29:15 06/14/12 (0)