In Reply to: As they say, the devil is in the details posted by Analog Scott on September 24, 2022 at 04:08:49:
And yet. . . paradoxically. . . the HDTT offerings CAN sound better than the remasters from companies which do own the master tapes (or master 35mm magnetic films). Tapes can deteriorate over time, and perhaps the HDTT source tapes were stored in a way which, over the decades, produced less deterioration.
This is one case where I'm in the "listening is believing" camp, despite whatever theoretical arguments there are in favor of recordings produced from the actual masters.
Or there are cases where the actual masters have been lost - such as the Skrowaczewski/Minneapolis recording of Schubert's Great C-major Symphony, and even Wilma's remastering of it in the 90's was produced from a backup tape - not the 35mm film master. OTOH, the commercial open reel tapes from the 60's (used by HDTT as sources for their reissues) were produced from those very 35mm film masters, even though they may have been a generation or two removed. I contend that the HDTT issue of this recording has that 35mm magnetic film "magic" (liquidity, air, etc.) which I don't hear even in Wilma's remastering.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Not even close to the original master tapes" - Chris from Lafayette 11:38:11 09/24/22 (3)
- RE: "Not even close to the original master tapes" - Analog Scott 12:05:07 09/24/22 (2)
- Ha! We are gradually (very gradually!) coming to agree on audio philosophy! [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 01:26:24 09/25/22 (1)
- My philosophy has evolved with the technology advances - Analog Scott 01:42:52 09/27/22 (0)