In Reply to: Without any science luddites here (i.e., those who focus... posted by Dave VH on March 28, 1999 at 16:22:05:
I thought I said (NT). :_)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- JJ Blinks and squints (nt) - jj 18:51:31 03/28/99 (11)
- Actually, I expected some comments from you regarding... - Dave VH 23:51:27 03/28/99 (10)
- My Opinion on Wire - jj 18:15:40 03/29/99 (3)
- Wow, not even flamed yet! :-) - jj 18:20:24 03/29/99 (2)
- Okay. You said "should".(NT) - Paul Willie 00:05:20 03/30/99 (0)
- Why! :-) - Rod M 20:43:12 03/29/99 (0)
- Not a really easy subject to discuss - jj 07:54:56 03/29/99 (5)
- didn't JG Holt discuss this once in Stereophile? - petew 16:28:02 03/29/99 (4)
- Re: didn't JG Holt discuss this once in Stereophile? - abc 02:13:35 03/30/99 (2)
- Re: didn't JG Holt discuss this once in Stereophile? - Monty 19:35:16 04/04/99 (1)
- Distortion is INFORMATION loss - jj 21:57:13 04/04/99 (0)
- I've no idea, sorry (nt) - jj 18:11:05 03/29/99 (0)