In Reply to: Rotel 1072 break-in time. posted by Iczerman on March 8, 2004 at 14:08:02:
I owned mine for 2 months. Initally I let it play on repeat 24-7 for a week. It got a little bit better but it couldn't even come close to the Arcam CD73 player that I also purchased. This is when the Arcam was brand new with no burn-in time. I still have the Arcam and it sounds sweet. The Rotel is long gone via Audiogon. Do your ears a favor and return that Rotel for a refund, then buy an Arcam. It is superior in ALL respects and costs the same.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Rotel 1072 break-in time. - Alnicoman 02:36:50 03/09/04 (11)
- You keep dissing the Rotel... - JefferyK 10:40:28 03/09/04 (5)
- Re: You keep dissing the Rotel... - Alnicoman 18:01:49 03/09/04 (4)
- Re: You keep dissing the Rotel... - JefferyK 08:47:09 03/10/04 (3)
- Re: You keep dissing the Rotel... - Alnicoman 11:39:47 03/10/04 (2)
- Rotel 1072... - SFDude 10:24:18 03/09/04 (4)
- Yes, it's the same player... - JefferyK 10:43:09 03/09/04 (3)
- Less than stellar setup - SFDude 12:07:55 03/10/04 (2)
- Yup... - JefferyK 13:13:00 03/10/04 (1)
- Jefferey just remember one thing - nathan_klassen 17:34:24 03/10/04 (0)