In Reply to: Just a thought ... posted by Jim Austin on June 11, 2017 at 13:55:59:
>> the whole history of digital audio, more or less, could be considered the history of dealing with "time-smear." <<
Yes. And in an interview I noted that when I look back on my career, even beginning with loudspeaker design various forms of "time smear" have been the fundamental basis for the path I've blazed. Therefore I would take your thought to the next level and remove the qualifier "digital". This only makes sense as the ear/brain is far more sensitive to time-domain information than to amplitude-domain information.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I actually take it a step further... - Charles Hansen 16:42:32 06/11/17 (11)
- RE: I actually take it a step further... - Jim Austin 17:48:11 06/11/17 (10)
- RE: I actually take it a step further... - J. Phelan 18:17:57 06/11/17 (9)
- An attempt to answer multiple posts below - Charles Hansen 02:52:32 06/12/17 (4)
- RE: An attempt to answer multiple posts below - J. Phelan 08:06:49 06/12/17 (3)
- Jitter - Meitner... - Doug Schneider 08:52:22 06/12/17 (2)
- RE: Jitter - Meitner... - J. Phelan 12:18:31 06/12/17 (1)
- RE: Jitter - Meitner... - Doug Schneider 12:52:08 06/12/17 (0)
- RE: I actually take it a step further... - Isaak J. Garvey 20:16:56 06/11/17 (0)
- RE: I actually take it a step further... - Jim Austin 18:30:33 06/11/17 (2)
- I should qualify that. - Jim Austin 18:52:23 06/11/17 (1)
- RE: I should qualify that. - J. Phelan 19:25:11 06/11/17 (0)