In Reply to: Enjoyed the second read posted by E-Stat on May 23, 2017 at 17:04:03:
I tend to agree about 24/96. But many believe archiving an analog tape to 24/192 then mastering to 24/96 is the best of both worlds. Of course, new recordings tracked, mixed, and mastered in 24/96 are also ideal.
Audiophiles love numbers. Many believed that 24/96 was going to be essentially "twice as good" as redbook, and of course, 24/192 was going to be 4x as as good. Not so.
As good as a read as this was..many, many albums come out of mastering houses at 24 bit/44.1 kHz.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Enjoyed the second read - Isaak J. Garvey 17:40:41 05/23/17 (0)