In Reply to: RE: That is interesting. I don't know whether the posted by Mungo Jerry on May 31, 2012 at 06:46:30:
"That claim is not presumptuous, but maybe a little cynical."
"Little cynical", what's that? 'Preposterous' is more on point.
Try to stay on topic. What does break-in have to do with the perception of quality?
"We come into these debates with preconceived notions."
Judging from your reply, in your case an agenda.
"How much do we "believe" before we start being suspicious. Where's that point?"
Agendas aside, what other point could there possibly be?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: That is interesting. I don't know whether the - soulfood 08:07:56 05/31/12 (0)