|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.196.16.84
I have jus replaced a aging dbx CDP with a ack! dAck! v1.3. I am using a lil Sony DVP S560D as transport while I save for a better transport. I am wondering what types of caps users have swapped in their dAcks! I use a Scott tube-amp and vintage KLH 17 2-way speakers with fresh Xover components and the dAck! sounds very nice as is, but I was wondering what kind of sound I would get if I swapped the AuriCaps with some Vitamin Q's or newer Ref Grade PIO's?Any comments on your thoughts or what you have used in the dAck! and its results. Jus FYI - I am using the Rat Shack premium Gold Series inters and Digital Audio cable in my system and Carol 12ga speaker wire from the Depot, my speakers are bi-wired. I know I could do better, but thats what I got.
Follow Ups:
Hi Nate,I have personally heard customers' units modified with Mundorf paper-in-oil and also Sonicaps (in a bypass configuration) to good effect. We voiced the sound with Auricaps, which are relatively full-bodied but some people find it slightly lean-ish (surprising considering that stock sound is already quite relaxed) and others want more resolution. Changing the caps gives quite different flavors of sound but most exchanges typically err on the side of more warmth with a tad of resolution enhancement. We have not tried Vit Q's or the PIO. We are also offering our ultra-resolution teflon capacitor upgrade as a retrofit option for all dAck! types. It improves resolution, tonal depth, and stage.
Best,
I found the Mundorf at Madison Sound - very nice caps, seems inline with the price for vintage Vitamin Q's - which are hard to find in the 3.3+ sizes. The Mundorf look like pretty large caps, would I have to mount these further in the dAck! housing on a board and run wiring to the board and outputs? Thanks for your reply - I am VERY pleased with the unit, as I am kinda new to hi-fi and was using a vintage CDP before. I can finally understand what others are talking about now with soundstage and attack/decay - something my other CDP jus didnt do right. Especially on my Norah Jones CD - seems now I can see/feel the pressure the bassist uses as he strums different strings - if that makes any sense - LOL. I am saving for a better quality transport to use - but I am happy to have the unit now - as I seem anxious to "discover" the music that are on my CDs now. I love classic rock, and I had heard that the dAck! may not be the DAC if that were my tastes. I have found no shortcomings so far with any CD I have listened to, and find myself wanting to listen to different types of music now. Norah Jones is a new discovery, thanks to reading posts here about her. I love good female artists, and she ranks rite up there with Annie Lennox now in my book.
Nate,Great to hear you're loving the unit. I'm glad people are still enjoying the original. The Mundorfs are very big and the 3.3 just *barely* fits inside the chassis - don't go any bigger than that. You'll have to watch out that you don't squish the switch assembly wiring and definitely get some more flexible wiring to route from the PCB to the output. The sound is not improved in the classic hi-fi sense (which would be more transparency, more resolution, attack speed, etc; the teflon ultra-rez is more along these lines), but in terms of communicativeness it is definitely elevated by the Mundorfs. It reminds me of the romantic sound of paper-in-oils with their gritty mids combined with enhanced resolution of a film cap. I liked it a lot but I don't think it's something that most digiphiles would prefer; definitely an analog/tube lover's kind of sound.
About the dynamics and attack speed, the 1.x was geared more towards making everything more pleasant to listen to. The approach was to bring out the depth of performances in terms of musical communicativeness rather than wow factor. The 2.0 addresses many areas of performance that a broader audience wanted more of - especially in dynamic attack, resolution on both extremes, and soundstage performance without compromising the design goals of the original - but the original still has its charms and on some types of music I still cannot pull away.
Best of luck with your cap tweaks.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: