|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
In Reply to: FT Audio LW-1 Preamplifier (SS) posted by Hyperion on November 14, 2002 at 23:27:36:
I have to agree that even though the stepped attenuators may be the best sounding option, the convenience tradeoff is not worth the difference in my book. In researching passive preamps, all reviewers of the Placette preamps state the stepped volume control will be an issue for some people and it's the one thing about them that they caution about. I listen a lot at night when I need the volume level low and a design like the Alps is preferable. My car audio system has a stepped attenuator (hardly a DACT I'm sure) and it's frustrating even then to not be able to find the optimum volume setting. The LW-1 appears to be a well thought out balance of features and quality. It may not be the absolute best in terms of sound quality, but it is very user friendly unlike some other components while maintaining a high degree of high-end sound.
![]()
Budrew, the stepped attenuator in the Placette is less of an issue than others in terms of volume level steps. The Placette has 128 discrete steps which is significantly more than most stepped attenuators - and it is remote controlled which is a big advantage for some of us.On top of that, Guy will attempt to select resistor values to match your source gear and gain of your system if you can give him some info about your current setup. He did this for me as my cd player source is a bit on the hot side at 3v out of the RCA jacks. I can barely even detect the difference in sound level between a single step and at moderately loud (normal) volume levels I'm approximately midway on the control range at a little under 64 steps of 128 available.
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: