Tweakers' Asylum

Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Caddock MP series or other's similar thick film

Posted by madisonears on November 17, 2016 at 20:31:36:
Sorry if I steered you in the wrong direction. Maybe my old ears/system are/is not as sensitive to an upper range sheen or perhaps I even appreciate compensation for some hearing loss. At least you can say you tried them.
I am not ready to shell out for AN silver tants, although I bought a pair of their new non-mag regular tants to use in my active xovers. I have recently gotten new midrange drivers and I'm about to build the newly designed passive crossovers. I've already purchased Caddocks, but I'm willing to try others. I thought Mills were pretty blah and the Duelund's were too bright. I actually liked the cheaper Mundorf MOX. I have never tried the expensive Mundorf's. I think their caps, although very detailed and open, tilt the FR upward to hi-fi levels, almost as you describe the Caddock. I use their SIO for tweeter caps.
Peace,
Tom E