Tweakers' Asylum

Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

and there is/are my problem(s)

Posted by dave c on December 11, 2008 at 12:43:10:
It reads as if PX have never bought anything from Lotus.
I am not sure what an e-commerce agreement is but I presume it places a trade restriction on someone.
If these products are genuinely (!!!) fakes then I would have thought that the Japanese seller would be liable for prosecution.
Maybe PX as well.
Perhaps someone could post pictures of both products and packaging so that we could compare them.
I assume the "fakes" must be labelled as Oyaide because otherwise the difference in packaging (and as has been pointed out, the plating) would make them a different product.
If (as has also been posted here) the "fakes" are indeed better, then it would suggest a reason for bringing the subject up.
Again I am not making accusations just saying that this is how it reads.