Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Tube DIY Asylum

Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: Cathode bypass cap removed and I like it

Posted by dave slagle on January 11, 2017 at 06:52:41:

OK.

I am not intimately familiar with the ESL63 but in general an ESL panel is a pure capacitance and the thing that makes them "difficult to drive" is actually a function of the step up transformer and the crossover that follows it. By removing the cathode bypass you have dramatically altered the behavior of the tube essentially increasing the RP from about 800 ohms to about 6K. This means your output impedance is now probably greater than the load it is driving and interestingly enough, some speakers actually like this situation.

The logical thing to do would be to use a mic and take frequency response measurement sweeps with and without the bypass cap and see if anything jumps out at you. My first guess would be that you would attenuate the HF info because of the higher output impedance working against a fixed capacitance. Unfortunately the 63's have a delay line in addition to a crossover so I fear simple theory goes out the window.

dave