Speaker Asylum

General speaker questions for audio and home theater.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: "I would not cross a sub past say 63hz."

Posted by Presto on June 21, 2012 at 09:40:26:
Yes, some smaller speakers will need a higher crossover point like that. In that case, I will run a "sub" under each speaker (except not for computer desktops of course). This way you get more of a pseudo-3-way than a sub/sat system. This is especially true if the sub lowpass filter is 2nd order. 2nd order + 90hz = too much sub localization for me.

I think this end of the spectrum is where many 'philes get "hard to integrate subs properly" from.

Myself, I love working with subs. Way more flexible than having you "sub" reproducing drivers stuck in the main speaker. Sub frequencies don't need to "blend" into the soundstage - they're naturally omnidirectional and if you're crossing over low enough and steep enough the sub-bass will blend into the sounstage with nary a problem.

Cheers,
Presto