|
Music Lane It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Jeez, Chris.
Posted by Rick W on January 7, 2017 at 15:57:23:
Anonymous? I can only assume you mean lacking personality. Even WITH specific examples of differences in interpretation (none provided) between Kertesz and the Czech conductors you mentioned all you'd be doing is basically saying you prefer one version over the other. Obviously that's fine, but it ain't like 500 other conductors' versions sound just like Kertesz's.
I have all the Kertesz except New World on London LP's and have no complaints. Good music, excellent conductor/orch. and good sound. The personality is in the music, and I hear nothing to suggest Kertesz is hindering that from coming out -- they aren't boring vanilla versions IMO.
I had a couple of the Neumann and got rid of them. Nuthin' special IMO and Superphon sound was not the greatest.
Seems to me that sometimes you create things outta thin air. Rather than English critics "projecting", I think you are the one projecting. There is no reason whatsoever to think English critics who dug the Kertesz/Dvorak "....were projecting their own "thrill of discovery" (i.e., of the music itself) onto the Kertesz recordings....". That combined with the "reports" you mention seems, ahh, Trumpesque :-)