Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: Outdated BG Radia thread over AC for Satie

Posted by josh358 on December 28, 2016 at 07:04:25:

OK, that would explain why the thread mentions the back cups. But why? that seems to me a recipe for issues at the M-T crossover point. Is he dong this to minimize cavity resonance and diffraction in the baffle?

The IRS appears to have a cardioid rather than figure 8 characteristic in the highs (24 front-facing tweeters, 12 rear facing = cardioid pattern). I remember a discussion of the IRS in which Nudell said that they'd experimented with various radiation patterns and found that a cardioid pattern provided the best imaging. I'd still say that the IRS produced the most holographic imaging of any speaker I have ever heard -- it was as if the instruments were hanging in space and you could thread your way between them.

It seems to me that monopole bass is a compromise. Dipole woofers run into trouble in the midbass because of cancellation from the rear wall reflection, but they confer partial immunity to the effects of room modes, which I think significantly improves bass realism. There are also issues at the crossover between the monopole bass driver and the dipole midrange -- the rear waves will cancel -- as well as the fact that one falls off linearly with distance and the other as the square of it. However, Nudell seems to have worked out the continuity issues in the IRS -- I don't remember the system sounding discontinuous like the Beta (actually, the Beta wasn't so much discontinuous as it sounded like the frequency bands were coming from different places!).