Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

We, as do most audiophiles, consider measurements...

Posted by Allen Wright on September 23, 2009 at 13:18:42:
... to be unimportant if the sonic results are there.

Our basic clock has a published jitter figure of one (ONE!) picosecond, if that's relevant. And that's before it's powered by our ULTRA low noise powersupply.

There is no point in arguing numbers, as they were proven to be irrelevant to sonic results years ago. Remember the battle of the low distorion solid state poweramps of the 70's - 0.001% against 0.0011% etc etc, and all sounding ugly!

But we plan to have an Upgraded 5400ES in England with our UK distributer soon, and maybe you can borrow it and test it with a HDMI setup, against a stock 5400ES. I am not able to make such a test, but would be interested in your feedback.

Regards, Allen (Vacuum State)