Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

Pretty much agree on all points but...

Posted by Ivan303 on January 7, 2017 at 20:41:27:

The new ES9028/9038 may well be a completely new animal and, at least in theory, DSD may be a better, easier format to decode anyway, or not.

And Channel Classics have some of the best recordings in their catalog I have yet to hear, so there is that.

Having never heard DSD 256 let alone files up-sampled to DSD 512, who knows?

Not me.

Plus one bad sounding DAC in the house won't kill me, especially at only about $900 delivered.