Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: JA's review, this is a 50K speaker ......

Posted by Dave_K on December 19, 2016 at 07:41:23:

The near field pseudo-anechoic measurements are pretty awful. The woofer frequency responses in Figure 2 look pretty bad, and that tweeter really should have a HPF on it. But I think it's a futile exercise trying to coherently sum the near field responses of a couple of horns and a couple of dynamic drivers, so I don't think Figure 3 says much at all. Same for Figure 7, because the relative arrival times are very different in the near field vs. the far field.

With a loudspeaker like this, I'm more interested in how everything comes together (or not) in the far field. And from approximately 60 Hz to 8 KHz, the in-room measurements look better than many others in Art's room.