Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Hmmmmmm.....I read JA's review

Posted by Dave_K on December 16, 2016 at 11:01:05:
They don't look so good in JA's standard suite of measurements, but the in-room frequency response measurement looks pretty respectable considering it's Art's room. Except in the top octave.

Their in-room response is compared with the Wilson Duette, and the Wilson looks worse everywhere except the top and bottom octaves. Art's Devore O/96 also looks worse except in the top octave.

I'm curious to know what it is about Art's room that gives every loudspeaker a humpback whale in-room response curve. And how does he manage to listen around it.