|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Pretty much everything you said here is wrong.
Posted by Analog Scott on November 27, 2016 at 19:16:14:
"As accurate as possible. That doesn't mean we're near there or even have a possibility of reaching there. But that doesn't mean you abandon the goal."
If you actually understand how stereo recording and playback works you should understand that "accuracy" that being *an accurate RECREATION of the original acoustic event* was never the goal.
"This isn't ice cream where everyone gets their favorite flavor. If it is there's nothing to aim for except as individuals and we're wasting our time in this hobby."
Nonsense. If one is enjoying the hobby it is hardly a waste of time. Do you really believe any hobby has to have a singlular goal otherwise it's a big waste of time? That is just ridiculous.
"I don't think I'm wasting my time and my goal is to go down a road to more realistic. We're not on the same road."
Whoa dude! Can't let that one go without pointing out how far off the mark you are here. Were not talking about "realistic" we are talking about "accuracy" and accuracy being an accurate RECREATION of the original acoustic event. When you understand the fundamental difference between the two you are then ready to participate in the conversation.