Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Ironically, the medical "gold standard" shares little in common with audio trials

Posted by E-Stat on November 8, 2016 at 06:59:33:
1. Nothing is compared. Let me say that again - nothing is compared. Participants don't judge two different choices.
2. One group gets control drug while other gets placebo.
3. There is no "skill" involved and training has no effect on results.
4. The test procedure involves no change whatsoever to the way in which the results are evaluated. As opposed to the *assumption* that extraneous gear introduced into the process (aka controls) has no effect.