Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: As for Reviewing...

Posted by Michael Lavorgna on October 31, 2016 at 07:07:47:
"So Mytek has to send me a DAC so I can assess MQA."

Not exactly since you'd also be assessing the DAC; there's no way around it. That's why I reviewed three different DACs for my MQA review. I think readers are interested not only in MQA but whether or not it makes the associated DAC less important.

As was reported in RMAF, there are over 200 MQA recordings available online. MQA have also made other recordings available for review purposes as you know from John Atkinson's use of his own files for his review. I was provided a number of recordings that I already own, using the same source files.