Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: MQA files sound very good on a good

Posted by Isaak J. Garvey on October 29, 2016 at 14:20:22:
Fair enough Jim. But on the flip side, what about the the repeated, immensely positive reporting on MQA by reviewers who have their mind set ON MQA. Does not it work both ways?

And the initial tide overwhelming positive write ups were based on carefully controlled show demos and later with a $300 portable DAC.

Can you at least understand the push back considering the reporting that was done on the so called "DSD 2.0" roll out?