In Reply to: Collective reply posted by DrM on April 5, 2001 at 13:48:23:
Nop, I did not “accuse†you in your “imitation of Streophille magazine†but I said that you approached your “duty as a reviewer†as the rest of reviewers’ militia: “consumer report†type review based on the enthusiastic and slightly ignorant exploration. The purpose of a good product is not to be a product anymore and you failed to realize it. (Or your system did not allow to.) Anyway, do let yourself be bothered: not a lot of people can handle it.Romy the Cat
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Thanks anyway - Romy 00:12:10 04/07/01 (1)
- Re: Thanks anyway - DrM 10:24:28 04/07/01 (0)