|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
|
|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: You are wrong about the likelihood of a Tsunami in that area. posted by Timbo in Oz on January 13, 2017 at 15:23:57:
I was speaking generally. Clearly, that area has a higher risk, as do some others. But with 450 reactors around the world, operating non-stop except for maintenance, that's 30 years x 365 days x 450 reactors since Chernobyl, that's 5 million operating days since Chernobyl, and there's been ONE major accident due to nature.
So, "one in a billion" is a stretch. Sue me.
:)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: You are wrong about the likelihood of a Tsunami in that area. - Inmate51 06:56:44 01/14/17 (1)
- The one MAJOR accident was not due simply nor solely to nature. - Timbo in Oz 09:27:34 01/14/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
