Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: RE: American manufacuring in the 60s posted by bcowen on June 19, 2016 at 14:47:57:
Ah, didn't know that. I thought it was the high fuel consumption that was the main downside to the RX-8, and that was what killed it at the dealers.
You combine naturally high fuel consumption with a free-revving engine (and a stick!), and the unknowledgable consumer, and there's going to be some complaints re fuel cost (especially here in Canada).
You may not believe it, but what killed it for me was a back seat that didn't fold down. That's all! Gotta have that, especially with such a tiny trunk, I'm always toting medium-size crap around.
Have a '13 Mustang now. It is a decently free-revving engine, but you don't need to get it "up there" like with a rotary, and with a stick I'm not unhappy at all. Never thought I'd ever own a Mustang. Cheaply made IMO, but works much better than it looks/seems like it would. They actually have got a lot of their shit together in many ways, spruce up the interiors to '80s European standards, and they should make some money...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: American manufacuring in the 60s - cfraser 15:53:26 06/19/16 (0)