Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Actually - up to posted by pictureguy on September 26, 2015 at 11:38:16:
According to wiki the 6 pot was simply deleted in '56 and the smallest engine option was then the 265 (4.3L) V8 with between 210 and 240hp.
Engine size increased to 283 cu in in '57.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Actually - up to - b.l.zeebub 12:15:54 09/26/15 (14)
- RE: Actually - up to - pictureguy 12:30:44 09/26/15 (13)
- RE: "Not the smallest V-8 ever" - b.l.zeebub 15:52:29 09/26/15 (12)
- RE: "Not the smallest V-8 ever" - pictureguy 13:24:22 09/27/15 (3)
- RE: "Not the smallest V-8 ever" - b.l.zeebub 16:03:09 09/27/15 (2)
- RE: "Not the smallest V-8 ever" - pictureguy 16:14:57 09/27/15 (1)
- RE: "Not the smallest V-8 ever" - b.l.zeebub 16:20:57 09/27/15 (0)
- RE: "Not the smallest V-8 ever" - Craiger56 17:46:44 09/26/15 (1)
- RE: "Not the smallest V-8 ever" - b.l.zeebub 06:17:06 09/27/15 (0)
- RE: "Not the smallest V-8 ever" - pictureguy 16:05:44 09/26/15 (5)
- Honda Racing of the 1960s - FenderLover 17:43:09 09/26/15 (4)
- And if we can look at their two-wheelers - Craiger56 18:03:34 09/26/15 (3)
- RE: And if we can look at their two-wheelers - pictureguy 20:05:24 09/26/15 (2)
- RE: And if we can look at their two-wheelers - b.l.zeebub 05:43:46 09/27/15 (1)
- and speaking of Triumph, there is the 3lt Stag V8 - JDK 13:49:24 09/29/15 (0)