Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: It's also folly to attempt... posted by mkuller on October 27, 2014 at 14:56:34:
even tin doesn't deny that. Since tin brought up last year's bowls, I'll re-mention some previously presented FACTS - The SEC's opponents were higher ranked and had fewer losses than the down on their luck PAC whatever conference. That the SEC didn't play PAC Weenies is a reflection of contractual bowl tie ins, and not, lol, fear of the PAC Weenies.
tin is right on one matter, the SEC's string of 7 or 8 (so many I've forgotten) National Championships was rudely interrupted last year by the Jameis Winston led Seminoles. BFD.
----------------------
"E Burres Stigano?"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Facts? Feel free to present your evidence that the SEC isn't the best football conference in the land - Road Warrior 15:19:22 10/27/14 (5)
- RE: Facts? Feel free to present your evidence that the SEC isn't the best football conference in the land - mkuller 20:36:43 10/27/14 (0)
- Again, we're discussing the SEC bowl performance. Did they play top teams? No. Did they play vastly inferior - tinear 17:16:30 10/27/14 (3)
- RE: Again, we're discussing the SEC bowl performance. Did they play top teams? No. Did they play vastly inferior - regmac 07:39:31 10/28/14 (0)
- I can say it anyway - srdavis2000 17:39:01 10/27/14 (0)
- 8 out of the last 10 national championships not good enuf for you? Man, yer strict! - Road Warrior 17:22:31 10/27/14 (0)