|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
|
|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: Look at last year's bowl game results w/SEC teams: posted by tinear on October 19, 2014 at 18:18:47:
to a 5 loss Texas Tech team,
Washington beat a 5 loss BYU team,
Ariz beat a 6, yes 6, loss Boston College team,
Oregon St beat a 5 loss Boys State team,
Wash St. LOST to a 6 loss Colo St. team.
None of those opponents were ranked
On the plus side, at least Stanford lost to a 1 loss Mich St team.
Avg losses per opponent, 4.75
SEC opponents (4 ranked) had losses of - 0, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 6, & 4
Avg losses per opponent, 3.70
You do remember what they say about stones and glass houses:)
----------------------
"E Burres Stigano?"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Let's see, last year Oregon beat a 5 loss Texas team, UCLA beat a 5 loss Va Tech team, Ariz St LOST - Road Warrior 20:08:13 10/19/14 (4)
- You don't argue, then, that SEC gets patty-cakes? Sure, the committees gave PAC easy - tinear 07:57:08 10/20/14 (3)
- Patty cakes? The SEC played higher ranked teams and teams with fewer losses than the PAC 12 teams - Road Warrior 15:26:23 10/20/14 (2)
- Not end of story. Your points do nothing but reinforce mine. SEC didn't play - tinear 15:43:15 10/20/14 (1)
- NOT a question of "want", it IS a question of contractual obligations that determine bowl matchups - Road Warrior 17:03:15 10/20/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
